BMJ: Prostate Cancer Screening – 20 years data

Apr 1, 2011

from BMJ 2011; 342:d1539

Abstract

Objective To assess whether screening for prostate cancer reduces prostate cancer specific mortality.

Design Population based randomised controlled trial.

Setting Department of Urology, Norrköping, and the South-East Region Prostate Cancer Register.

Participants All men aged 50-69 in the city of Norrköping, Sweden, identified in 1987 in the National Population Register (n=9026).

Intervention From the study population, 1494 men were randomly allocated to be screened by including every sixth man from a list of dates of birth. These men were invited to be screened every third year from 1987 to 1996. On the first two occasions screening was done by digital rectal examination only. From 1993, this was combined with prostate specific antigen testing, with 4 µg/L as cut off. On the fourth occasion (1996), only men aged 69 or under at the time of the investigation were invited.

Main outcome measures Data on tumour stage, grade, and treatment from the South East Region Prostate Cancer Register. Prostate cancer specific mortality up to 31 December 2008.

Results In the four screenings from 1987 to 1996 attendance was 1161/1492 (78%), 957/1363 (70%), 895/1210 (74%), and 446/606 (74%), respectively. There were 85 cases (5.7%) of prostate cancer diagnosed in the screened group and 292 (3.9%) in the control group. The risk ratio for death from prostate cancer in the screening group was 1.16 (95% confidence interval 0.78 to 1.73). In a Cox proportional hazard analysis comparing prostate cancer specific survival in the control group with that in the screened group, the hazard ratio for death from prostate cancer was 1.23 (0.94 to 1.62; P=0.13). After adjustment for age at start of the study, the hazard ratio was 1.58 (1.06 to 2.36; P=0.024).

Conclusions After 20 years of follow-up the rate of death from prostate cancer did not differ significantly between men in the screening group and those in the control group.

Trial registration Current Controlled Trials, ISRCTN06342431.

why do some people wear face masks at airports, why do medieval helmets have face masks, best mask for vog n95 so2, pneumocystis pneumonia and n95 mask, funda para nokia n95, battery respirator mask, lighest weight full face cartridge face mask 3m, 3m particulate respirator 8576, how to safely draw on face mask, 3m 7885b mask, what are the benefits of using a face mask, n95 face mask uses, vision kamado costco, pgmea safety respirator, air filter face masks, benefits of medical face mask, ugly face masks, black cloth surgical mask, how to buy osha approved respirator, how to make face masks dry quicker, how to make slime with bacing powder and face mask just those in greediance, face shield storage cabinet, how to make pimple face mask, skull medical mask, cotton dust mask amazon, mask face garyob ingredients, will illness face mask work for dust, kiku masamune japanese sake face mask, fox mask target, respirator for chemicals, organic chemical cartigage respirator, skin face mask horror, niosh regulations, difference between n95 and n100, 3m half mask 7500 skull, how long does it take to get rid of coronavirus, medical gas mask, where to by surgical mask in tokyo, japanese surgical mask fashion what are they called, where can you buy guoer n100 face masks in asheville n, what is p100 vs n95, 3m home dust mask 5 pack, how to make a avocado face mask without honey, 3m hepa respirator mask medium, most comfortable 3m n95 mask, respirator dust mask difference, will n95 protect against pepper spray, how to get gold dust majoras mask, tube bandana dust mask, where can i get a cloth mask of my own face,